Custom Event Setup

×

Click on the elements you want to track as custom events. Selected elements will appear in the list below.

Selected Elements (0)
    Login

    Cart

    Your cart is empty

    3Dresyn TPU-like vs flexible engineering SLA / DLP / LCD 3D printing resins

    Mechanical Resistance Comparison & Executive Summary

    3Dresyn TPU-like is a flexible engineering photopolymer designed for parts requiring compliant behaviour, deformation tolerance and a more elastic engineering response than rigid or semi-rigid thermoplastic-like families. It is positioned for technical applications where flexibility, compressibility or controlled deflection matter more than dimensional rigidity.

    With flexural strength below 40 MPa, elongation below 30–50%, Young’s modulus below 900 MPa and Shore D 60–70, TPU-like occupies the engineering-flexible segment between soft deformation-oriented materials and tougher semi-rigid resins.

    Choose TPU-like when a part must bend, absorb deformation and maintain functional flexibility rather than hold rigid structural geometry.

    Data Table — Typical Properties (post-cure; internal data and competitor TDS)

    Resin Flexural strength Elongation Young’s modulus Noted traits
    3Dresyn TPU-like <40 MPa <30–50% <900 MPa Flexible engineering response; Shore D 60–70; lower modulus and controlled compliance.
    Flexible/tough engineering families Varies Varies Varies Broad category; some grades are softer, others tougher, but not all provide TPU-like engineering balance.
    Liqcreate Tough-X Impact-focused 100–150% Lower stiffness Very ductile; often softer and more elongation-driven than TPU-like controlled engineering flex.
    Flexible urethane-style resin families Varies Varies Low-to-medium Can be softer or more elastomeric; not always suitable for engineering-fit flexible parts.

    Mobile: scroll horizontally to view all columns. The first column remains visible while scrolling.

    Comparability note: Flexible engineering resins differ widely in modulus, elongation and post-cure behaviour. Comparisons should normalize actual use case, deformation mode and post-processing route.

    Where 3Dresyn TPU-like Wins

    1) Engineering flexibility instead of soft elastomeric behaviour

    • TPU-like is positioned for parts requiring functional flex and compliance while still retaining engineering-grade usability.

    2) More controlled structural flex

    • Its modulus range makes it relevant for flexible technical components that should not behave like very soft rubber-like systems.

    3) Useful for deflection-driven applications

    • Suitable for seals, flexible interfaces, compliant covers and technical components that need deformation tolerance under use.

    Application Guidance

    • Choose 3Dresyn TPU-like for: flexible technical parts, compliant covers, soft interfaces, impact-moderating geometries and functional components requiring controlled engineering flex.
    • Choose a stiffer material if dimensional rigidity dominates.
    • Choose a softer elastomeric resin if very low modulus and high compression response are required.

    Processing Notes (Quick Start)

    • Compatible with open SLA, DLP and LCD systems in the 385–405 nm range.
    • Use validated cure conditions to avoid excessive stiffening after post-cure.

    Normalization & Caveats

    • TPU-like positioning reflects functional engineering behaviour analogy, not direct equivalence to molded TPU.
    • Mechanical behaviour depends strongly on geometry, thickness and cure state.

    References

    • 3Dresyn TPU-like internal product data
    • Liqcreate Tough-X TDS
    • Relevant flexible engineering resin documentation

    From prototyping to industrial production, performance depends on materials, calibration and process control