Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Which 3Dresyns® material system is right for your application

3Dresyns · Which Material System Is Right? — at-a-glance hub 3DRESYNS · WHICH MATERIAL SYSTEM IS RIGHT? FIND YOUR MATERIAL SYSTEM BY APPLICATION A fast starting point before deeper selection, calibration, validation or ordering ROUTE BY YOUR OBJECTIVE VISUAL PROTOTYPES Visual models & prototypes. FUNCTIONAL PARTS Mechanical, durable engineering parts. MEDICAL & BIO Controlled biological interaction & safety. DENTAL Models, guides, splints & aligners. CASTABLE & MOLDS Casting, sacrificial & mold workflows. CERAMICS & METALS Sinter, powder & indirect routes. SPECIALTY & ADVANCED 2PP, VAM, inkjet, optics & more. ⚠ Remember: the right material isn’t the fastest or cheapest — application defines the route, performance defines the final material system. At-a-glance hub · full routing, decision logic & next engineering steps on the page.

Which 3Dresyns® material system is right for your application?

This guided page helps identify the most suitable 3Dresyns® material family according to application, performance requirement, manufacturing route and workflow complexity.

Use this page as a fast starting point before moving into deeper technical selection, calibration, validation or ordering.

Start with the simplest question

What does your part, mold, pattern, powder route or material system actually need to do after printing, shaping, curing, debinding, sintering or post-processing?

1. Visual models or general prototypes

This route is appropriate when the printed part is mainly used for visualization, concept validation, basic fit-checking or low-demand prototyping.

Best fit
  • general-purpose materials
  • standard SLA / DLP / LCD workflows
  • cost-sensitive and fast-start applications
  • low mechanical or regulatory demand
Open

2. Functional engineering parts

This route is appropriate when parts must perform mechanically, survive handling, resist stress, maintain dimensional accuracy or deliver real durability.

Decision logic
  • Standard: low-demand functional use
  • Next-generation: balanced functional performance
  • Engineering / thermoplastic-like: higher mechanical demand or lower tolerance for failure
Open

Quick rule for engineering users

If the part is mainly visual, standard materials may be enough. If the part must function, move to next-generation or engineering materials. If failure is not acceptable, use a structured engineering selection route and validate the printed part.

3. Biocompatible and medical-related materials

This route is appropriate when the final application requires controlled biological interaction, extractables management, safety-oriented workflow control or biocompatibility-related validation.

Best next step
  • start from the biocompatible material family
  • review IFU and safety / regulatory positioning
  • validate processing before drawing conclusions about final safety or performance
Open

4. Dental materials

This route is appropriate for orthodontic, restorative, denture, splint, model and laboratory dental workflows.

Typical routes
  • dental models and orthodontic workflows
  • guides, splints and rigid or flexible appliances
  • gingiva, denture and specialty dental systems
  • direct-print aligner workflows when applicable
Open

5. Castable, sacrificial and mold-related materials

This route is appropriate when the printed part is not the final object, but an intermediate used for casting, burnout, sacrificial removal, mold generation or indirect manufacturing.

Typical uses
  • investment casting
  • sacrificial patterns and soluble structures
  • durable and sacrificial molds
  • tooling, cavities, channels and indirect AM workflows
Open

6. Ceramics, metals and powder routes

This route is appropriate when the final material target is ceramic, metal, glass, polymer powder or another loaded material system requiring shaping, debinding, sintering or powder-based processing.

Decision logic
  • Direct print-to-sinter: when the loaded green body must be printed directly
  • Indirect AM: when printed molds or sacrificial structures produce a better manufacturing route
  • SLS / Cold Fusion: when the process starts from powders or powder binders
  • LMM: when lithography-based metal manufacturing is the selected route
Open

7. Specialty and advanced materials

This route is appropriate when the application requires a specific material behaviour or advanced process outside standard photopolymer logic.

Typical routes
  • inkjet and material jetting
  • 2PP nano / micro fabrication
  • VAM volumetric additive manufacturing
  • NIL and UV / EB photoresists
  • optics, electronics, conductive, ESD, magnetic, neutron-absorbing or refractive-index materials
Open

Need a simpler starting point?

If you are not yet sure about material categories, start from application-first guidance instead of product-name selection.

Still unsure?

If the application is functional, regulated, load-bearing, process-sensitive or technically ambiguous, use a structured selection route instead of choosing only by material label.

Recommended routes

Next step in your engineering workflow

Use the links below to move from quick routing to validation and engineering material selection.

Next actions

The right 3Dresyns® material is not defined by what prints fastest or costs least, but by which material system matches the real application, process route and validation requirement.

Application defines the route. Performance defines the final material system.

Continue with structured material selection

Use these 3Dresyns resources to continue from the technical information on this page to material selection, documentation or implementation support.