Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Select your 3D resin by Shore hardness, Young’s modulus and real structural behaviour

Part of the 3Dresyns® Structured Selection Framework (SSF)

SSF integrates three complementary engineering pillars:

Learn about SSF →

This tool helps you estimate how material stiffness (Young’s modulus) and part geometry interact to determine the perceived flexibility of a printed component. The calculator provides a first-order engineering comparison that helps identify whether a geometry will feel flexible or stiff before printing.

Simple 3-step logic
  • Step 1: Start from the Shore hardness range or target tactile feel.
  • Step 2: Use wall thickness and span to estimate how much the part bends.
  • Step 3: Select the resin that meets your stiffness target while also satisfying toughness and strength requirements.
Scientific scope and limitations

This calculator is intended for first-order comparative screening. It uses a simplified beam-deflection model to compare relative stiffness between material and geometry combinations.

It is not a structural simulation and should not replace engineering validation, testing or finite element analysis (FEA) for final part design.

Why thickness matters so much

For beam-like structures, bending stiffness scales approximately with E × t³, where E is Young’s modulus and t is thickness. This means that doubling thickness increases stiffness by roughly eight times. In many cases, geometry has a stronger influence on perceived stiffness than the material itself.

What “Finger press” means here

In real use, a finger applies force over an area, not at an ideal mathematical point. This tool uses a simplified beam-bending model so thickness and materials can be compared consistently. It is intended for first-order screening, not for full FEA or final design validation. If the tool predicts bending larger than the span length, the chosen inputs are not representative for a realistic “feel” check.

Thickness presets (tmin)

tmin represents the smallest wall or feature thickness present in the region of interest. This value is often used as a conservative reference for stiffness estimation because the thinnest section usually controls the bending behaviour.

Use-case presets

Click one preset to start with realistic values, then refine the inputs to better match your geometry.

Finger press intensity

These buttons set realistic starting values for a normal wall thickness. You can still edit the inputs afterwards.

Inputs

Young’s modulus E (MPa)
For finger-press “panel feel”, typical E is ~500–3000 MPa, depending on wall thickness, geometry and post-cure.
110100100010000
Target bend (δ, mm)
This is your target “feel”. Smaller δ means a stiffer response.
Span (L, mm)
Think of this as the local unsupported length that bends.
Width (b, mm)
An effective width of material participating in bending.
Finger force (F, N)
Rule of thumb: 1 N ≈ 100 g-force.
Typical finger press forces in product interaction are often in the range of ~1–5 N, depending on part size and user interaction.
Thickness (t, mm)
t is the thickness used in the bending calculation. It may be equal to tmin or larger if the evaluated section is thicker than the minimum feature.
Fine detail walls are often ~0.05–0.20 mm, general thin features ~0.3–0.8 mm, and structural walls or panels ~0.8–2.0 mm.

Outputs (live)

Thickness needed to meet your feel target
t_required:
If your real thickness is below this value, the part will feel more flexible than your target.
Predicted bend for your chosen thickness
δ_at_t:
Quick indicators
δ/L:
E × t³:
L/t:
F (g-force):

E × t³ is a quick stiffness indicator combining material and geometry. For similar spans and loads, a higher value usually means a stiffer response.

Thickness vs modulus chart

This curve shows how the required thickness (t_required) varies with Young’s modulus for the selected load and geometry. It helps visualize how geometry can compensate for material stiffness differences.

t_required (mm) for δ ≤ target Young’s modulus E (MPa, log scale) E=1800 MPa
Best suited for
  • Early-stage resin selection before printing
  • Comparing stiffness trends between resin families
  • Screening thin walls, clips, panels and delicate features
  • Identifying which candidates should be validated with CRT and SMSP
What this tool does not replace
  • Final structural validation of the printed part
  • Finite element analysis (FEA)
  • Application-specific testing under real service conditions
  • Exposure calibration and curing-depth characterization
Recommended next step

Once a suitable stiffness range is identified, the next step is to validate curing behaviour and printed performance using:

Engineering note

The calculator is based on a simplified beam-bending model used for first-order screening. Real printed components may deviate due to anisotropy, boundary conditions, support structures, print orientation and post-curing conditions. Final designs should be validated experimentally.